Last Fall Fr.S, our associate pastor began the CRHP (Christ Renews His Parish or "chirp") program at our parish. As a graduate (survivor) of the "Called and Gifted" program (Archdiocesan Lay Ministry program--- or as I affectionately refer to it the "Called to Heresy" program) I have to admit I am always skeptical of any Archdiocesan sponsored program--- that is just a consequence of the Bernadin Legacy here in the Archdiocese of Chicago (Thanks to our past Cardinal we have Call To Action and the Common Ground Initiative devotees running most of the show here).
So needless to say when I did my retreat last fall I was happily surprised by the program. I thoughly enjoyed the weekend and I could see the positive influence this has on parish life. If I had to put it in a nutshell I would say it centers on a group of parishoners (leaders) sharing their personal witness to Christ active in their life---which through group discussions and activities leads the others to look at and think about how Jesus is present in their own life. Basically it is sort of like taking your fellow parishoners by the hand and introducing them to Jesus as he is present in your life and then encouraging them to do the same thing for the next group of parishoners.
Anyway--- tonight it is my turn to witness. It is the first run through of my witness (My topic is Renewal) before the group---Dang it, I'm nervous!!!! Yes, I know I blurt out all kinds of stuff on this blog--- but you know I am safely hidden behind this monitor with some fashion of anonimity. In evaluating the situation I know it is not fear of those who will be present--- I have come to know my fellow retreat leaders very well--- and Fr. S has been very supportive and encouraging--- I think I am afraid of letting Jesus down--- of getting in the way of the Holy Spirit--- now don't laugh--- I am serious! I want this to be totally about Him. So I am requesting prayers--- please pray that what I say will give glory to God alone and encourage the listeners to even greater trust in our merciful Lord--- Thanks!
On to business as usual--- I read this article yesterday:
Bishops' "Faithful Citizenship" undermined by conservative groups.
A short time ago this would have frosted my bulb big time-- now I just shake my head and grin. It is from the National Catholic Reporter so that should suffice for an explanation---still I feel compelled to point out the hypocrisy and bias--- not that it would change anyone's thinking there--- it's just plain fun to do it! So--- here's a snippet and my response:
"Dinges said he was surprised "by the number of people who told me that they have 'never seen the conflict this bad before.' " There is little civility when conservative activists challenge diocesan workers presenting the teaching of the bishops. "I was struck by the sense that this has really gotten ugly," said Dinges.
(Two things----- First---civility is a two way street and the dissmissive and condescending attitudes of many liberal Catholics I have run into streches one's patience to the breaking point at times----secondly--- just maybe the past couple of years which have been filled with one sordid and at times criminal revelation after another has caused many Catholics to question the motives of some bishops, maybe as a body the American bishops have lost some of their credibility when it comes to instructing the faithful on matters of morality. It is interesting that there was no such outcry when the topics of dissent were things like women priests, acceptence of homosexual unions, contraception and abortion. These were not dissent but the "sensum fidelium"--- so now Catholic liberals are shocked by this act of "disobedience"??? Uh----huh--- Apparently the sensum fedelium should only work in their favor--- when it supports their ideals---because after all they are the ones who know what's really important. Just maybe because many of the bishops refuse to sprout spines and act to defend the truths of the Holy Catholic Church some people will feel compelled to do it.)
So who are the conservative activists? Dinges places them in five groups: Catholic traditionalists, conservatives and neoconservatives, the "radicalized element" of the antiabortion movement, Republican political partisans and "evangelicalized Catholics."
(IOW's not "real" Catholics like them---)
Though there was clearly some organized effort to disrupt and disparage the church's official outreach, most of agitation was caused, said Dinges, by individuals acting in small groups, frequently with the support of conservative parish clergy who showed little fear of contravening diocesan guidance on election-year activities.
(Does this wrangling sound vaguely familiar to the democratic party cries of conservatives disrupting election processes? This is even more hysterical in light of the fact that these people are constantly "contravening" Church teaching in most other areas)
Further, said Dinges, in some dioceses the activists "were emboldened by the actions of some bishops," particularly in dioceses where bishops threatened to withhold Communion from pro-choice Catholic politicians. In some cases, chastened by the hostility diocesan presenters received at Faithful Citizenship education efforts, bishops simply cancelled additional sessions, leaving the Catholic take on the election to the Catholic Answers crowd.
Anything new here?
Is there anything new here? Dinges thinks so. In the immediate post-Vatican II era, he noted, disputes between liberal and conservative Catholics centered largely on intra-church issues, such as liturgical practices. Today's tug-of-war is focused on the "broader culture wars in American society" and liberal Catholics and their conservative brethren are no longer even "pulling on the same rope."
(Ah-ha--- and here is the real issue--- they are losing their grip and they know it! The old guard is retiring, resigning (sometimes under the pall of scandal) and dying off--- they see the younger Catholics as being more orthodox and ---horrors---- more conservative especially on moral and liturgical issues---- the "new church" they tried to "sing into being" is beginning to crumble. This is panic time for them--- when in reality it is what the Holy Father has repeatedly referred to as the "New Springtime of Evangelization". Living in my diocese with the legacy of the late Joseph Cardinal Bernadin this is a very out in the open tug-of-war--- it gets very tiring and at times it has weighed heavily on my faith---especially my two years at the School of Heresy--- (read: lay minister training) In fact one teacher---a substitute (a lesbian and abortion activist) chosen by the lay teacher of the "Communication Skills" class told us one evening "the bible was written by men who saw women as livestock" and "that we are not bound to believe anything that makes another group of people *feel* oppressed as actually coming from the mouth of God (emphasis mine). She continued "after all ---the writer's were influenced by the oppressive societies they lived in." After that night I made a Holy Hour before every class.
Said Dinges, "We do not even know how to talk to each other -- to have responsible adult conversations -- in areas where there is serious disagreement." The structures that are supposed to facilitate communication within the church, says Dinges, are "dysfunctional."
(See above--- they sure are!I would say this is the same issue the democratic party is having--- one of credibility. Liberalism has run its course and many people through their God given gifts of intellect and reason have come to see the dangers and pitfalls of many aspects of contemporary liberal ideology and they are rejecting it. Failure to comminicate occurs when one side gets tired of conversing with the other because the only option is their way or the highway. In closing I give another example --- I was appointed by my pastor to be our liason to the archdiocesan Ecumenical and Interfaith Commission--- on our formation night I heard all kinds of wonderful activities many parishes are engaged in with those of other faiths--- but then the meeting turned more informal and discussion was about other Catholics ---someone asked "what was going on with all the "young people" why are they all so interested in having Latin masses offered again--- and their thinking is so conservative--- they are also into all that Marian stuff again too." To which the gray haired gentleman sitting accross from me said "It's that Mother Angelica and EWTN--- it's evil ---she has done more damage to the church than anyone else I can think of." ------- Welcome to the Archdiocese of Chicago!)
To be fair Cardinal George has done an amazing job of cleaning up the seminaries and putting reins on some of the more ridiculous liturgical trends but being Bernadin's successor has placed a tremendous task before him. For the resistence he has faced and the relatively short time he's been here he has made some significant differences--- I just pray it continues.
Recent Comments